· Free guide

Lab Report Example: A Full Biology Lab Report With Data and Notes

Composite sample written by GradeDraft for this page. The data below is illustrative, created to demonstrate the format, not the output of a real experiment. It is one of all writing samples GradeDraft publishes.

Direct answer

A lab report follows IMRaD order: abstract, introduction with a hypothesis, materials and methods, results with a table and figure, discussion with error analysis, and references. This biology lab report example runs one experiment, temperature and catalase activity in potato extract, through every section, with a margin note on each.

On this page
  1. About this sample: level, style guide, length
  2. The full lab report
  3. Section-by-section checklist
  4. How to use this sample without copying it
  5. Have one written to your own brief
Level
Undergraduate, introductory biology
Style guide
APA 7
Length
about 1,000-word report body plus a 3-source reference list (about 4 pages)
Written by
the GradeDraft research paper desk

The full lab report

Most pages that promise an example of a lab report show a template. This lab report sample is complete: one small experiment, temperature against catalase activity, reported through every IMRaD section a biology lab report is graded on.

Composite sample written by GradeDraft

Effect of Temperature on Catalase Activity in Potato Extract

Abstract

Catalase, the enzyme that breaks down hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen, is present in nearly all aerobic organisms and is easily extracted from potato tissue for classroom study. This report measures catalase activity across five temperatures (4, 22, 40, 50 and 60 degrees Celsius) using a filter-paper disc float assay, in which a faster float indicates faster oxygen production and therefore higher enzyme activity. Discs soaked in a standardized potato extract were submerged in a 1.5% hydrogen peroxide solution held at each target temperature, and float time was recorded across three trials per temperature. Mean float time was shortest at 40 degrees Celsius (22 seconds) and increased sharply above and below that point, with discs at 60 degrees Celsius failing to float within a 300-second cutoff. Results match catalase's expected mid-range temperature optimum and its loss of activity through heat denaturation.

  1. 1

    Method, trial count, and result in under 150 words, so a reader who stops here knows what the report found. Write it last.

Introduction

Catalase (EC 1.11.1.6) is one of the fastest enzymes known, converting hydrogen peroxide, a toxic byproduct of aerobic metabolism, into water and oxygen gas at a rate approaching the diffusion limit (Chelikani et al., 2004). Because catalase activity is easy to observe visually through oxygen bubble production, it is a standard subject for an introductory enzyme-kinetics lab. Like most enzymes, catalase's activity depends on temperature: reaction rate typically rises with temperature up to an optimum, then falls as heat disrupts the protein's folded structure, a relationship general biochemistry texts describe for enzymes broadly (Nelson & Cox, 2017). This experiment tests that relationship directly in potato-derived catalase.

Hypothesis: catalase activity, measured as float time in a filter-paper disc assay, will be fastest (shortest float time) at a mid-range temperature near 40 degrees Celsius, and will slow sharply at both a refrigerated temperature and a temperature at or above 60 degrees Celsius, where the enzyme is expected to denature.

  1. 2

    The hypothesis names the independent variable (temperature) and the dependent variable (float time) and predicts a direction, which gives the Discussion something specific to answer.

Materials and methods

Materials. Russet potato, blender, cheesecloth, filter paper (6 mm discs), 1.5% hydrogen peroxide solution, five water baths held at 4, 22, 40, 50 and 60 degrees Celsius and checked with a calibrated thermometer, 250 mL beakers, stopwatch, forceps.

Extract preparation. 50 g of peeled potato was blended with 100 mL of cold distilled water for 30 seconds, then filtered through two layers of cheesecloth to remove solids. The filtrate was kept on ice and used within 30 minutes of preparation to limit activity loss before testing.

Procedure. For each temperature, 100 mL of 1.5% hydrogen peroxide was equilibrated in its water bath for five minutes. A filter paper disc was submerged in the potato extract for 10 seconds, lifted with forceps to drain excess liquid, then dropped to the bottom of the hydrogen peroxide solution. A stopwatch recorded the time from submersion to the disc floating to the surface, which happens once enough oxygen gas has collected under the disc to overcome its weight. Each temperature was tested in three trials with a fresh disc and fresh hydrogen peroxide solution each time, and the observation window was capped at 300 seconds.

  1. 3

    Every quantity is exact, so a classmate could repeat the experiment from this section alone. Methods use past tense and passive voice ("was blended," "was recorded").

Results

Mean float time was shortest, meaning catalase activity was highest, at 40 degrees Celsius, and increased at both the lower and the higher temperatures tested (Table 1, Figure 1). At 60 degrees Celsius, no disc floated within the 300-second cutoff in any of the three trials, consistent with denaturation rather than simply slower activity.

Table: Mean time to float (seconds) by temperature, potato catalase in 1.5% hydrogen peroxide (illustrative data created for this sample; n = 3 trials per temperature)

Temperature (degC) Trial 1 (s) Trial 2 (s) Trial 3 (s) Mean (s) SD
4 179 158 167 168 10.5
22 80 69 73 74 5.6
40 24 20 22 22 2.0
50 47 56 50 51 4.6
60 >300 >300 >300 no float -

Scroll horizontally to see every column.

Figure 1 (described): a line graph plots mean float time in seconds (y-axis, lower means faster) against temperature in degrees Celsius (x-axis). The line falls from 4 to 40 degrees Celsius, then rises steeply from 40 to 50 degrees Celsius; the 60-degree point is plotted off-scale, past the 300-second cutoff, to mark denaturation rather than a slow but measurable rate.

  1. 4

    The figure caption states what is plotted, which direction means faster, and how to read the off-scale point, so Figure 1 makes sense without the body text.

Discussion

The results support the hypothesis: float time was shortest at 40 degrees Celsius and increased on both sides of that point, the rise-then-fall pattern described for enzymes generally (Nelson & Cox, 2017). Catalases from different organisms vary widely in properties such as heat stability (Switala & Loewen, 2002), so the optimum measured here applies to this potato extract and this assay only. The sharp jump between 50 and 60 degrees Celsius, rather than a gradual slowdown, is consistent with denaturation: past a threshold, heat unfolds the enzyme's active site fast enough that activity collapses within the trial instead of merely slowing.

Between 4 and 40 degrees Celsius, mean float time fell from 168 to 22 seconds, a more than sevenfold difference. That falling segment reflects faster molecular motion: enzyme and substrate collide more often at higher temperature, so the reaction speeds up until the protein's structure begins to fail. The 50-degree result, slower than 40 but still measurable, suggests partial denaturation, with some enzyme molecules still active. By 60 degrees Celsius, too few remained active to lift a disc within 300 seconds.

Error analysis. The 4-degree trials showed the largest spread (SD = 10.5 s), most likely because condensation on the cold beaker made the disc's exact submersion moment harder to time consistently across trials. A second limitation is that float time is an indirect proxy for reaction rate: it depends on the disc's oxygen-holding capacity as well as the reaction itself, so the assay ranks relative activity across conditions rather than measuring catalase kinetics in absolute units. A titration-based or spectrophotometric assay would remove that indirectness, at the cost of equipment a typical introductory lab does not have.

Conclusion. Potato catalase, assayed by filter-paper disc float time, showed its fastest activity near 40 degrees Celsius and lost measurable activity by 60 degrees Celsius, supporting the hypothesis that catalase activity in this system follows the same rise-then-fall temperature pattern documented for enzymes broadly. Because catalases differ in structure across organisms (Chelikani et al., 2004), a follow-up run at 35, 40, and 45 degrees Celsius would locate this extract's optimum more precisely.

  1. 5

    The error analysis names one specific source of variation, condensation timing at 4 degrees, instead of a generic "human error" line.

References

Chelikani, P., Fita, I., & Loewen, P. C. (2004). Diversity of structures and properties among catalases. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 61(2), 192-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-003-3206-5

Nelson, D. L., & Cox, M. M. (2017). Lehninger principles of biochemistry (7th ed.). W. H. Freeman.

Switala, J., & Loewen, P. C. (2002). Diversity of properties among catalases. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 401(2), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9861(02)00049-8

  1. 6

    APA 7 references use a hanging indent, and both journal articles carry a DOI so a reader can open the source.

Section-by-section checklist

The list follows IMRaD order and ties each item to a choice in the sample lab report above.

Check your own lab report against these ten items
  • Title names the variable and the system, not just the topic ("Effect of Temperature on Catalase Activity in Potato Extract," not "Enzyme Lab")
  • Abstract (120-250 words) states method, trial count, and the direction of the result, written last even though it prints first
  • Introduction states why the question matters and ends on a testable hypothesis, not a general statement of purpose
  • Hypothesis names the independent variable, what you changed (here, temperature), and the dependent variable, what you measured (here, float time), and predicts a direction
  • Materials and methods list exact quantities and are detailed enough for a classmate to repeat the experiment from the paragraph alone
  • Methods are written in past tense and passive voice ("the extract was filtered," not "we filtered the extract")
  • Results report numbers and a table or figure without interpreting them; interpretation waits for Discussion
  • Table and figure captions are self-contained: a reader should understand what is shown without reading the body text
  • Discussion answers the hypothesis directly, supported, not supported, or partially, before discussing anything else
  • Error analysis names one specific, checkable source of variation, not a generic line about human error
integrity

Study the method, not the numbers

Three things are worth taking into your own report: the IMRaD order, the exact detail in Materials and Methods, and a Discussion that answers the hypothesis first. Not worth taking: the data, which is illustrative and was never measured, or any sentence. This sample is published and indexed, so an instructor or a checker can find a matching line or dataset in seconds. Never submit or paraphrase it.

Have one written to your own brief

See how an order works and the full price list before you send your data and handout.

Questions about this sample

Should a lab report be written in past tense and passive voice?

Past tense, yes, because the experiment is finished. Passive voice ("the sample was heated") is the traditional default because it keeps the focus on the procedure, and most introductory courses still expect it. Many journals and some instructors now accept active voice for clarity, so check your rubric.

How long is a lab report?

It depends on the course and how much interpretation the handout asks for. The sample above runs about 1,000 words, roughly four double-spaced pages. Upper-level courses usually expect a longer introduction and Discussion, so follow the page or word range on your handout.

Can I use this illustrative data in my own lab report?

No. The numbers in Table 1 were created to show the format and the expected temperature curve, and the table says so. Reporting data you did not measure is fabrication, a more serious integrity violation than copying text. Report the numbers your own experiment produced.